W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Editorial issues around DTB (and also for BLD, SWC and FLD)

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:24:43 +0100
Message-ID: <4875F17B.80800@deri.org>
To: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Jos de Bruijn wrote:
>> It was basically, I guess, because the document started with onyl the 
>> title "Data Types and Builtins" ... I am anyway fine to change it to 
> 
> The title should be changed as well.

already done. Should obviously be adoprted in FLD/BLD as well.

Axel

> Best, Jos
> 
>> Datatypes consistently, without wanting to discuss whether one or the 
>> other makes "more sense", I just want it consistent. ;-)
>>
>> best,
>> Axel
>>
>>> Best, Jos
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unless I hear objections by tomorrow, I would change 1.
>>>> even if the document is frozen, ok?
>>>>
>>>> And I would strongly suggest we resolve 2. before LC for BLD and SWC
>>>>
>>>> Axel
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres, Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/

Everything is possible:
rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:Resource.
rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subPropertyOf.
rdf:type rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:subClassOf.
rdfs:subClassOf rdf:type owl:SymmetricProperty.
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2008 11:25:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:52 GMT