Re: ISSUE-43 ISSUE 41 - Proposed resolution for membership and classification

Christian de Sainte Marie wrote:
>>
>> Proposed: Close Issue-41 by including in BLD membership formulae of 
>> [...]
> 
> An issue to take into account in discussing this is whether and how it 
> would impact Dave's use case for the membership formula [1].

After refreshing my memory on the definition of # in BLD, I am a little 
bit ashamed of having started that discussion, here and at the telecon 
(blush)...

However, I think I heard Jos and maybe others say that, in its BLD 
specification, # could not be used to state membership in types defined 
in an XML schema, the way I imagined to use it in my example.

Can someone explain me why?

Thanx,

Christian