Re: draft of "RIF Core Design" text [Version 2]

> I would not quite say that: my understanding is rather that, not to have 
> "coreness" issues block the progress of that spec, we decided to stop 
> worrying about them for now and continue with BLD. But we did not decide 
> not to use the Core WD1 (or BLD for that matter) design for a possible 
> future core.

Good point.  Now:

   This document is a placeholder. The design specified in the previous
   draft of this document ([24]30 March 2007 draft) was intended to
   serve as a core, common to all RIF dialects. The Working Group has
   since decided to lower its priority on designing a common core and
   to first progress on the design of a logic dialect. With this in
   mind, the previous core design has been renamed and improved and is
   available as [25]RIF Basic Logic Dialect (BLD). There is also a
   publication, [26]RIF RDF and OWL Compatibility. At the time of this
   publication, it has not yet been determined whether or not a new
   design for RIF Core will be published in the future.

[24] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rif-core-20070330
[25] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rif-bld/          [not live yet]
[26] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-rif-rdf-owl/      [not live yet]

       -- Sandro