W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > November 2007

RE: [Fwd: Negation and Disjunction in RIF]

From: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:45:46 -0800
Message-ID: <8F4A4531BB49A74387A7C99C7D0B0E0503508974@NA-PA-VBE02.na.tibco.com>
To: "Christian de Sainte Marie" <csma@ilog.fr>
Cc: "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Seems like a simple enough answer: RIF is a rule interchange format, so
there is no reason why there should not be a dialect supporting SWRL
(non-NAF and non-disjunction). Assuming there is interest in
interchanging SWRL rules to/from non-SWRL rules.

Possibly the questioner would prefer to know:
- How does SWRL relate to BLD ?
- Is there some other dialect required for SWRL ? 
- If so is there any development plans for such a dialect ?

Paul Vincent
TIBCO | ETG/Business Rules 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Christian de Sainte Marie
> Sent: 19 November 2007 12:04
> To: RIF WG
> Subject: [Fwd: Negation and Disjunction in RIF]
> 
> All,
> 
> The question below was asked on the rif-public-comments mailing list.
> anyone cares to draft a reply?
> 
> Christian
Received on Monday, 19 November 2007 12:46:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:43 GMT