W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: [Fwd: Negation and Disjunction in RIF]

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:56:06 +0000
Message-ID: <474187E6.9060201@deri.org>
To: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>
CC: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Paul Vincent wrote:
> Seems like a simple enough answer: RIF is a rule interchange format, so
> there is no reason why there should not be a dialect supporting SWRL
> (non-NAF and non-disjunction). Assuming there is interest in
> interchanging SWRL rules to/from non-SWRL rules.

Here it gets more complicated:

Note that SWRL is an *extension* of OWL, thus, before addressing SWRL, 
we need to fully solve OWL compatibility, which is also work in progress 
at the moment.

Axel

> Possibly the questioner would prefer to know:
> - How does SWRL relate to BLD ?
> - Is there some other dialect required for SWRL ? 
> - If so is there any development plans for such a dialect ?
> 
> Paul Vincent
> TIBCO | ETG/Business Rules 
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org]
>> On Behalf Of Christian de Sainte Marie
>> Sent: 19 November 2007 12:04
>> To: RIF WG
>> Subject: [Fwd: Negation and Disjunction in RIF]
>>
>> All,
>>
>> The question below was asked on the rif-public-comments mailing list.
>> anyone cares to draft a reply?
>>
>> Christian
> 
> 


-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres
email: axel@polleres.net  url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Monday, 19 November 2007 12:56:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:43 GMT