- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 09:25:02 -0400
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> Unless I'm missing something there is nothing in that section concerning > typed literal data values. There seems to be no mention of them in > either the abstract syntax or the semantics, just a list of xsd types at > the front. Is that material now somewhere else or is it work in > progress or am I just blind? [*] > > Similarly whilst the introduction says that IRIs are used to refer to > individuals, predicates and functions the abstract syntax doesn't yet > support that. [Reasonable at this stage, I'm just noting it so we don't > forget it.] Dave, I have now updated the document to include the discussion of the abstract data type in the formal/concrete syntax and semantics. Will appreciate feedback. cheers --michael
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2007 13:30:01 UTC