W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > December 2007

Re: Another try at subclass

From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:50:35 +0000
Message-ID: <476146BB.9090705@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: axel@polleres.net
CC: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Axel Polleres wrote:
> 
> Chris Welty wrote:
>>
>>
>> </chair>
>>
>> Back in August I proposed a "friendly amendment" for the 
>> rif:subClassOf relation (aka ##) saying that:
>>
>> rif:subClassOf rdfs:subproperty rdfs:subClassOf .
> 
> 
> that would mean that each rif:subClassOf should be a rdf:subClassOf...
> aehm... shouldn't it be - if any - just the other way around?
> 
> rdfs:subClassOf is more specific.

I don't think so. The original objection to using rdfs:subClassOf was 
the reflexivity. This permits rif:subClassof to not be reflexive.

Dave
-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2007 15:46:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:44 GMT