- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:50:35 +0000
- To: axel@polleres.net
- CC: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Axel Polleres wrote: > > Chris Welty wrote: >> >> >> </chair> >> >> Back in August I proposed a "friendly amendment" for the >> rif:subClassOf relation (aka ##) saying that: >> >> rif:subClassOf rdfs:subproperty rdfs:subClassOf . > > > that would mean that each rif:subClassOf should be a rdf:subClassOf... > aehm... shouldn't it be - if any - just the other way around? > > rdfs:subClassOf is more specific. I don't think so. The original objection to using rdfs:subClassOf was the reflexivity. This permits rif:subClassof to not be reflexive. Dave -- Hewlett-Packard Limited Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2007 15:46:36 UTC