Re: [TED] CORE Pages Edited for Uniform Constants and Multisorted Approach: Actions 186 and 192

> Hi Sandro,
> 
> my responses are inlined, starting in the first column.
> 
>>   * You added another level of hierarchy, with=20
>>          CORE/Conditions/Positive=20
>> 
>>     Is that something that's important to you?  I'd rather have the wiki
>>     pages under the document node just be titled as the section is
>>     titled, in general.    But I can change the code the handle the
>>     hierarchy if you think it's helpful.
> 
> As mentioned offline, it is important to us since there are
> a few more sections and subsections planned starting from the
> CORE root. If you could expand the code for one more level
> that would be great 

Okay ... I guess the code should be opaque to hierarchy anyway. 

> and could benefit future W3C documents.
> BTW, is wikitr open source or will it be? Parameterizing the
> CSS could make it a great universal tool, and could make a
> difference in the HTML-authoring role of wikis.

In principle it's open source, but it's really ugly, because I've been
experimenting will different ways to do it.  I've had interest from
other Working Groups and certainly intend to make a public release when
it's better.   (I think I'm also migrating it from prolog to python.)

>>   * There's shared text between=20
>>        http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/CORE/Conditions
>>     and
>>        http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/CORE/Conditions/Positive
>> 
>>     I assume that's an oversight?
> 
> I guess you are mostly referring to the bulleted lists about
> FO, LP, PR, RR, IC, QY: Yes, I will deal with this redundancy,
> likely eliminating it from .../Conditions/Positive.

Yep.

>>   * These Back/Root/Next links are kind of nice, but very un-wiki-like
>>     and likely to end up broken.   I think if the sections are all
>>     like
>>        CORE/Horn_Rules
>>     then people will figure out to go up to CORE if they are lost, and
>>     there they will see the outline of all the sections.
> 
> I can comment out the navigation links again if there is no
> easy way for wikitr to ignore certain parts of the wiki source.

I can make wikitr ignore parts, I guess, if you want to maintain those
links.   How would you like to tell it which parts to ignore?

>>   * Is there an idea behind the all-caps name CORE? =20
> 
> No. But, when we realized that some would have preferred Core,
> there were already links to CORE from several other pages, and
> since yesterday there are even more.

Yeah, it's probably not worth changing it; I was just wondering if there
was a clever acronym or something.   :-)  
[ "Core Offering Rule Exchange" ?   :-) ] 

     -- Sandro

Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 13:59:25 UTC