RE: [TED] CORE Pages Edited for Uniform Constants and Multisorted Approach: Actions 186 and 192

Hi Sandro,

my responses are inlined, starting in the first column.

  * You added another level of hierarchy, with 
         CORE/Conditions/Positive 

    Is that something that's important to you?  I'd rather have the wiki
    pages under the document node just be titled as the section is
    titled, in general.    But I can change the code the handle the
    hierarchy if you think it's helpful.

As mentioned offline, it is important to us since there are
a few more sections and subsections planned starting from the
CORE root. If you could expand the code for one more level
that would be great and could benefit future W3C documents.
BTW, is wikitr open source or will it be? Parameterizing the
CSS could make it a great universal tool, and could make a
difference in the HTML-authoring role of wikis.

  * There's shared text between 
       http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/CORE/Conditions
    and
       http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/CORE/Conditions/Positive

    I assume that's an oversight?

I guess you are mostly referring to the bulleted lists about
FO, LP, PR, RR, IC, QY: Yes, I will deal with this redundancy,
likely eliminating it from .../Conditions/Positive.

  * These Back/Root/Next links are kind of nice, but very un-wiki-like
    and likely to end up broken.   I think if the sections are all
    like
       CORE/Horn_Rules
    then people will figure out to go up to CORE if they are lost, and
    there they will see the outline of all the sections.

I can comment out the navigation links again if there is no
easy way for wikitr to ignore certain parts of the wiki source.

  * Is there an idea behind the all-caps name CORE?  

No. But, when we realized that some would have preferred Core,
there were already links to CORE from several other pages, and
since yesterday there are even more.

Best,
Harold

Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 23:33:41 UTC