>Suppose I have a rule set like: > > bindreq @le (bound, bound) > less(?x,2) <- @le(?x,2) > >then I expect, from the virtual KB wording to get at least two results > > less(1,2) > less(2,2) > >but the bindreq changes that so that I get no results. > >How can you account for the meaning of the bindreq pragmas? > > As a practitioner I would expect a rule set compiler to issue an error message stating that this is an illegal rule because ?x is unbound in the rule condition. > >Received on Friday, 23 December 2005 00:45:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:25 GMT