- From: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:04:13 -0700
- To: Mhyst <mhysterio@gmail.com>
- Cc: Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com>, "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEnTvdB8y+WZLMzFfTwxDJH1u=BiPoiD5ePUQSGo5BPTdXajuQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Mhyst <mhysterio@gmail.com> wrote: > Subscription and rental were thought for physical objects. Digital copies > are quite different animals. You cannot perpetuate the same model with > digital copies. And if you want to do it, then you have to give digital > copies users the same rights that with physical objects. > These are statements, not explanations. Do you have any explanations ? > > > 2013/10/4 Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> > >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Emmanuel Revah <stsil@manurevah.com>wrote: >> >>> Bonjour Karl, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2013/10/04 16:38, Karl Dubost wrote: >>> >>>> Let's try to reply. Making questions to hide affirmation is never a >>>> good way to have peaceful discussion ;) >>>> >>>> Emmanuel Revah [2013-10-04T09:10]: >>>> >>>>> Why is that finding a better "thing" is considered as the only way to >>>>> avoid W3C's recommendation of EME ? >>>>> >>>> >>>> So basically, content owners currently uses a business model that is >>>> working for them. I'm not judging if it's a good or a bad business >>>> model at that point. It's just a fact. >>>> >>> >>> >>> Actually, I would tend to think it's yes and no. Yes it works for them, >>> up to now it's been working great. But no, it's probably not a good >>> business model for the near future. (In short, they need to move the web, >>> and fast, or risk extinction.) >> >> >> Could you elaborate on exactly what business models you think fall into >> the category and why ? Particularly, I'm wondering if you think >> subscription and rental models are obsolete and if so why ? >> >> ...Mark >> >> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 21:04:41 UTC