- From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 06:35:05 -0400
- To: Nikos Roussos <comzeradd@mozilla-community.org>
- Cc: "public-restrictedmedia@w3.org List" <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
Nikos Roussos [2013-06-26T05:58]: > On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 05:53 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote: >> Nikos Roussos [2013-06-26T05:37]: >>> Nobody talked about obfuscation. >> >> http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=public-restrictedmedia&index-type=t&keywords=obfuscation&search=Search > > I think the right term here is Encryption. In most of these mentions > obfuscation refers to the software, not the content. My own poor man definition of content obfuscation or more exactly obfuscated content: "A content which has been encrypted and where the users do not have ownership of the key for decrypting that content." > And in some of these is the content providers who suggest software > obfuscation as a mean to have an Open Source implementation of DRM. So it is exactly why I mentioned earlier about the need of a glossary. We do _not_ use the terms with the same meaning. :) I'm not that much interested by the real definition but more by the definition which is used on the list during the discussions. :) http://www.w3.org/community/restrictedmedia/wiki/Glossary_of_Terms -- Karl Dubost http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 10:35:09 UTC