Re: "Premium content"

No, because not all expensive content is DRM-controlled. 

--
Duncan Bayne
ph: +61 420817082 | web: http://duncan-bayne.github.com/ | skype: duncan_bayne

I usually check my mail every 24 - 48 hours. If there's something urgent going on, please send me an SMS or call me at the above number.

----- Reply message -----
From: "Jeff Jaffe" <jeff@w3.org>
To: "Duncan Bayne" <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>
Cc: <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
Subject: "Premium content"
Date: Tue, Jun 18, 2013 10:53 AM


On 6/17/2013 5:32 PM, Duncan Bayne wrote:
>> Yes, it is probably more a marketing term.  It appears to mean content
>> that is owned by people that invested a great deal in creating the
>> content and therefore are highly focused on getting a return on their
>> investment.
> My concern with the term is that it implies a hierarchy of value - with
> that type of content (basically, Hollywood movies and expensive TV
> shows) at the top.  I don't think it's language we should be using.
>
We could call it expensive content.

Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 01:08:23 UTC