- From: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:09:25 -0400
- To: Duncan Bayne <dhgbayne@fastmail.fm>
- CC: public-restrictedmedia@w3.org
On 6/16/2013 5:31 PM, Duncan Bayne wrote: >> The Web and TV Interest Group brought in a requirement for "content >> protection" - a level of protection for premium content that meets their >> needs. > This may seem like a minor issue, but: what does the term "premium > content" mean in the context of this discussion? It feels more like a > marketing term than a useful description of anything. > Yes, it is probably more a marketing term. It appears to mean content that is owned by people that invested a great deal in creating the content and therefore are highly focused on getting a return on their investment.
Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 14:09:39 UTC