Re: Print, monochrome, and high-contrast

Hi all,

Sorry if by keeping on improving media queries, the csswg keeps on making you even more disappointed that the whatwg won't let you use them for content images :-P

Jokes aside, there is really little I can do on that front. I've tried throwing some ideas in a while ago, but it doesn't seem that this made much of a difference.

Anyway, if you have some feedback about the the new proposed media queries, (or ideas about new ones), this is certainly most welcome. Be sure to send that to www-style@w3.org though, as I'm afraid I don't have the bandwidth to follow messages on public-respimg@w3.org.

-Florian

"François REMY" <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote:

>For what it's worth, the CSS WG just added a way to handle "ambiant 
>luminosity" media features in Media Queries Level 4 [1], and there's a 
>proposal to merge/complement that with the "high-contrast" media
>features 
>from Microsoft. Maybe there should be a joint effort here to specify
>the 
>need and come with a joint solution. People from the accessibility
>front are 
>still to give their opinion on a possible merge of those media queries.
>
>I put the editor of CSS Media Queries (Florian Rivoal) in carbon copy
>of 
>this mail so that he can follow this thread [2].
>
>
>________________________________________
>[1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/mediaqueries4/
>[2] http://www.w3.org/mid/CDA25383BBDF46DDA7DC093ECA1F01EF@gmail.com 

Received on Thursday, 25 October 2012 20:24:29 UTC