W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-respimg@w3.org > December 2012

Fwd: Publishing Use Cases and <picture> document through HTMLWG

From: Mathew Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:07:43 -0500
To: public-respimg@w3.org
Message-Id: <9A811DDC-8BFF-4964-856A-5DC27163C5C9@matmarquis.com>
Hey guys!

Just wanted to forward this along for the sake of anyone that isn’t subscribed to the HTML WG mailing list.

Now, this doesn’t represent a huge milestone in and of itself—it doesn’t mean we’re any more or less likely to see the `picture` spec as a First Public Working Draft. It *does* give us our next steps on the way to a FPWD, and a rough timeline.

The web standards process isn’t quick or easy, but we are making steady progress.

-M


Begin forwarded message:

> Resent-From: public-html-admin@w3.org
> From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
> Subject: RE: Publishing Use Cases and <picture> document through HTMLWG
> Date: December 6, 2012 3:08:27 PM EST
> To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
> Cc: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, "Edward O'Connor (ted@oconnor.cx)" <ted@oconnor.cx>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
> 
> Moving this non-technical discussion to public-html-admin@w3.org.  I have included the original message below.  It can also be found at:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0173.html 
> 
> The HTML WG weekly teleconference discussed this item today.  See minutes:
> http://www.w3.org/2012/12/06-html-wg-minutes.html#item13
> 
> There seemed to be agreement on the call that the HTML WG should consider your publication request along with an upcoming request to publish the srcset extension specification [1] in January since the srcset author would like some time to process some bugs filed on that specification.
> 
> Note that since the functionality in the <picture> extension proposal [2] overlaps with the functionality in the srcset attribute proposal it was felt that it might be best if the two documents included something in their Status sections to answer the question "Why is the WG publishing two overlapping extension specs?".  I suggest you work with the srcset attribute author to see if you can agreement on that kind of text.
> 
> The WG Chairs will bring this item forward in January or sooner if we see progress on the srcset attribute proposal bugs.
> 
> /paulc
> HTML WG co-chair
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/srcset/w3c-srcset/Overview.html  
> [2] http://picture.responsiveimages.org/ 
> 
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com] 
> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 4:46 PM
> To: public-html@w3.org
> Cc: Ian Jacobs
> Subject: Publishing Use Cases and <picture> document through HTMLWG
> 
> Hi,  
> The RICG is seeking guidance on how to publish the Responsive Images Use Cases document through the HTMLWG: 
> http://usecases.responsiveimages.org/
> 
> We would also like support to publish the picture element spec as a FPWD: 
> http://picture.responsiveimages.org/
> 
> Would appreciate some help to make that happen. 
> 
> Kind regards,
> Marcos 
> -- 
> Marcos Caceres
> http://datadriven.com.au
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 16:08:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 7 December 2012 16:08:10 GMT