W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-respimg@w3.org > December 2012

Re: Publishing Use Cases and <picture> document through HTMLWG

From: Chris McAndrew <chris@csmcreative.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 17:18:59 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFV3ugnO0GNjT3Dm177ZQhRfe7Pyuwkq4t3SkAoTw42PYOeu=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mathew Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>
Cc: public-respimg@w3.org
That is awesome guys. You guys have been doing the heavy hitting so
congrats to you!

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Mathew Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com> wrote:

> Hey guys!
>
> Just wanted to forward this along for the sake of anyone that isn’t
> subscribed to the HTML WG mailing list.
>
> Now, this doesn’t represent a huge milestone in and of itself—it doesn’t
> mean we’re any more or less likely to see the `picture` spec as a First
> Public Working Draft. It *does* give us our next steps on the way to a
> FPWD, and a rough timeline.
>
> The web standards process isn’t quick or easy, but we are making steady
> progress.
>
> -M
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *Resent-From: *public-html-admin@w3.org
> *From: *Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
> *Subject: **RE: Publishing Use Cases and <picture> document through HTMLWG
> *
> *Date: *December 6, 2012 3:08:27 PM EST
> *To: *Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
> *Cc: *Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, "Edward O'Connor (ted@oconnor.cx)" <
> ted@oconnor.cx>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
>
> Moving this non-technical discussion to public-html-admin@w3.org.  I have
> included the original message below.  It can also be found at:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0173.html
>
> The HTML WG weekly teleconference discussed this item today.  See minutes:
> http://www.w3.org/2012/12/06-html-wg-minutes.html#item13
>
> There seemed to be agreement on the call that the HTML WG should consider
> your publication request along with an upcoming request to publish the
> srcset extension specification [1] in January since the srcset author would
> like some time to process some bugs filed on that specification.
>
> Note that since the functionality in the <picture> extension proposal [2]
> overlaps with the functionality in the srcset attribute proposal it was
> felt that it might be best if the two documents included something in their
> Status sections to answer the question "Why is the WG publishing two
> overlapping extension specs?".  I suggest you work with the srcset
> attribute author to see if you can agreement on that kind of text.
>
> The WG Chairs will bring this item forward in January or sooner if we see
> progress on the srcset attribute proposal bugs.
>
> /paulc
> HTML WG co-chair
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/srcset/w3c-srcset/Overview.html
> [2] http://picture.responsiveimages.org/
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:w3c@marcosc.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 4:46 PM
> To: public-html@w3.org
> Cc: Ian Jacobs
> Subject: Publishing Use Cases and <picture> document through HTMLWG
>
> Hi,
> The RICG is seeking guidance on how to publish the Responsive Images Use
> Cases document through the HTMLWG:
> http://usecases.responsiveimages.org/
>
> We would also like support to publish the picture element spec as a FPWD:
> http://picture.responsiveimages.org/
>
> Would appreciate some help to make that happen.
>
> Kind regards,
> Marcos
> --
> Marcos Caceres
> http://datadriven.com.au
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 22:20:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 7 December 2012 22:20:17 GMT