W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa@w3.org > July 2009

Re: XHTML + RDFa + @role

From: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:07:59 +0100
Message-Id: <99EA22B1-984A-4853-AA6B-FCCAD82D5B55@g5n.co.uk>
Cc: public-rdfa@w3.org
To: Laurens Holst <laurens.nospam@grauw.nl>
On 9 Jul 2009, at 22:36, Laurens Holst wrote:

> The version attribute is deprecated in HTML4.01, never used, and no  
> longer present in HTML5Ö I also see no language in the XHTML 1.1  
> specification defining the content format of this attribute or  
> requiring its use (although it does seem to be in the DTD, which I  
> find strange as it wasnít in XHTML 1.0ís), and I know of no  
> implementations using such an attribute. So it seems a bit useless  
> to add it. Letís keep HTML free of versioning.


Wasn't my idea - the version attribute is already in XHTML+RDFa 1.0  
(and setting it is a "SHOULD" in the conformance requirements). I've  
stuck to much the same requirements, just changing the DTD and the  
value for the version attribute.

As far as implementations that use it, my own semantic web tool  
Swignition has a "strict mode" where it refuses to parse a document  
as RDFa without the version requirement. So there's at least one  
implementation that does use it.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Friday, 10 July 2009 07:07:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:15:04 UTC