Manu Sporny wrote: >general feeling was that HTML5 was far more exciting than XHTML2. >[1] http://north.webdirections.org/ Karl Dubost wrote: >RDFa will require it would seem, a similar community and effort to become equally established. In my opinion, a street level view; The likes of Ivan, Karl, Doug, many W3C others, are doing an outstanding job, thank you. HTML 5, was created out of a deep pool of frustration, poor leadership from the top people at the W3C, nothing has changed. Friends of XHTML, are seeing a train wreck, the same "old" W3C "hero-worshiped" "leadership" does nothing of any substance to join the battle. HTML 5 has won by default. Who, Where? is the top representative from the W3C in the html5/xhtml5 process. Marketing RDFa? Get someone to lead the effort in the html5/xhtml5 battle before it is over. RDFa, without a meaningful relationship with HTML 5, a bleak future?Received on Friday, 13 February 2009 09:25:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 13 February 2009 09:25:06 GMT