W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Official Response to ISSUE-148: Stefan Schumacher's Last Call Review Comments

From: Stefan Schumacher <stefan@duckflight.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:57:19 +0530
To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <513D5D27.26583.4B6F3BC@stefan.duckflight.de>
Hello Manu,

you addressed all my concerns and solved the issues.

Thanks
Stefan

On 10 Mar 2013 at 14:06, Manu Sporny wrote:

> Stefan, I'm preparing the 2nd Last Call for HTML+RDFa 1.1 and will be
> responding to all of your LC comments in the next few days. Thanks again
> for your great review comments. :)
> 
> On 02/02/2013 11:22 AM, Stefan Schumacher wrote:
> > In 2.1 there is still one 'Internet media type' and one 'Internet 
> > Media Type', I would actually vote for 'internet media type', all 
> > three words small. Two occurances to check.
> 
> I changed both to "Internet Media Type" to align with RFC2046,
> Wikipedia's article on Internet Media Types and various findings by the
> TAG that capitalize the phrase in the same way:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2046.txt
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2002/0129-mime
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3023.txt
> 
> > In 3.1 there is still written DTD, where it should be DOCTYPE 
> > declaration. Comment from Shane McCarron from 31.01.2013:
> > 
> > The document does not 'contain a DTD'.  It contains a DOCTYPE 
> > declaration that references an XHTML+RDFa family DTD.  Or something 
> > along those lines.
> 
> While still there when you read the document, this was fixed before the
> Last Call.
> 
> > The new three-sentence-version of the second last list item in 3.1 
> > that you wrote is very much understandable now. Well written.
> 
> Good to hear that. :)
> 
> > In EXAMPLE 2 in section 2.1, there is a 'schema:': @prefix schema: 
> > <http://schema.org/> .
> > 
> > It is not really clear, how the RDFa processor gets the information 
> > to put this schema: prefix, because there is no obvious 
> > explanation/declaration in EXAMPLE 1. It might be declared in the 
> > initial context, but the innocent reader might not now. Not sure, if 
> > it is really necessary to add a sentence for that, just thought, 
> > first examples should be understandable without any questions open.
> 
> I removed the http://schema.org/ prefix declaration and used full URLs
> instead. That will probably be easier for somebody that is not familiar
> with Turtle to understand.
> 
> This addresses all of your Last Call review comments and closes:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/148
> 
> Please let us know if we've addressed all of your concerns, ASAP.
> 
> -- manu
> 
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Aaron Swartz, PaySwarm, and Academic Journals
> http://manu.sporny.org/2013/payswarm-journals/
> 



-- 
Stefan Schumacher
Lonavala, Maharashtra, India
+91 9923670737
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 04:28:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:58 UTC