W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 19:40:38 +0100
Message-Id: <E7FEAA70-26D1-4744-9A05-372BA890B0EE@w3.org>
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, RDFa Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
To: "shane@aptest.com" <shane@aptest.com>

> On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>> I suspect my implementation should either not issue a warning for link+rel, or should check whether it is an RDFa usage pattern, ie, whether the value of href is a CURIE or a URI. Probably the latter. Wait... using link with a URI is also a legitimate usage pattern! Ie, only CURIE-s are to be flagged I guess...
> Where a CURIE is either a safe-curie or a thing that matches the production for a CURIE *and* the scheme used is pre-declared?  Or declared in the initial context? 

I guess all of the above...:-( 


> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron
> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2013 18:41:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:58 UTC