W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146)

From: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 09:59:13 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOk_reFPiofaQigQqkFyH0Py_9wnn7bwj4XzmVKDTT0jRKuZFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, RDFa Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> I suspect my implementation should either not issue a warning for
> link+rel, or should check whether it is an RDFa usage pattern, ie, whether
> the value of href is a CURIE or a URI. Probably the latter. Wait... using
> link with a URI is also a legitimate usage pattern! Ie, only CURIE-s are to
> be flagged I guess...
Where a CURIE is either a safe-curie or a thing that matches the production
for a CURIE *and* the scheme used is pre-declared?  Or declared in the
initial context?

Shane P. McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2013 15:59:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:58 UTC