W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: HTML+RDFa source updated (ISSUE-97, ISSUE-144, ISSUE-146)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 13:27:56 +0100
Cc: RDFa Working Group <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <997B745C-C212-471B-915D-24FB729EED5D@w3.org>
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Gregg,

minor comments, in view of a (hopefully) Last Call publication.

1. Item #12 in section 3.1: There is a remark on whether @value will be retained or not. I guess, editorially, this should be a note after the bullet items, and maybe flag this item as an 'at risk feature'.

2. Item #13, HTML Literal, Note: is this correct? I mean, if we are talking about an HTML datatype, setting the prefixes would mean adding xmlns:XXX to the generated HTML literal. Isn't that a big no-no? Or are we talking about @prefix declarations to be put here?

3. Section 3.5.1, note on 'at risk': I wonder whether we should call out in the text that this feature has a strong relationship to @itemref...

4. Section 3.5.1, first paragraph: I think the reference should not only be RDFa Core 1.1 but also the HTML5 extras in this document.

5. Section 3.4.2, first paragraph: I am not sure it is worth referring here to the entailment rules of RDF Semantics. First of all, it will tend to scare away people; but, in fact, the text here can/should be self-consistent anyway, so that referenced does not really add any new information. I propose to remove it.

6. Section 3.4.2, did we say that a simple example would be useful here?

Note to ourselves:

- add an example (or two) on the reference folding into the new version of the primer
- we have to publish a new version of the RDFa namespace document, including rdfa:ref and rdfa:Prototype

Thanks!

Ivan


On Dec 28, 2012, at 01:57 , Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:

> Prior to the next conference call, I updated the HTML+RDFa spec to include some missing elements and added a "Reference Folding" section. That section, in particular, could benefit from some more editorial work.
> 
> * Relevant to ISSUE-97, I added text to use the text content of a <time> element, if the element has no @datetime or @content attributes.
> * Relevant to ISSUE-144, I added a "Reference Folding" section with a short description of the feature, and nomative language specified using Ivan's SPARQL UPDATE.
> * Relevant to ISSUE-146, I added missing steps for head/body.
> 
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-in-html/Overview-src.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/97
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/144
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/146


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf







Received on Tuesday, 1 January 2013 12:28:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:58 UTC