Re: A small addition to our last resolution...

On 11/08/2012 11:38 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> We decided that a processor may issue a warning if a prefix
>> redefines one that is in the initial context. But we may want to go
>> a little bit further: if, at any point, a prefix redefines one that
>> is already in scope, a warning should be issued, too. Ie, that
>> situation should not be restricted to the initial context case.
>> 
>> I think that would be a useful extension of our resolution.
> 
> +1
> 
> That actually makes it easier to implement too, as I don't need to
> detect which redefinitions are for the initial context, and which for
> another prefix definition.

+1

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power
http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/

Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 03:53:14 UTC