W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: SVG test case with embedded RDF/XML

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:15:36 +0200
Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <DCC3F2C7-72D0-4A6A-A3E7-063648EABCAA@w3.org>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>

On May 17, 2012, at 15:02 , Toby Inkster wrote:

> On Thu, 17 May 2012 13:41:23 +0200
> Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> 
>> Very strictly speaking this is a test of the SVG spec together with
>> RDFa, but I agree the test should be added. 
> 
> Indeed - which is why I wasn't sure if it should be classified as
> required.
> 
>> I have added it to github, except that I added as 0304 (and not
>> 0310), because that was the next in line.
> 
> OK. I jumped numbers just in case anybody else was working on tests
> 304, 305, etc in parallel with me.
> 
>> Oh, and I do not pass this test yet:-)
> 
> Yes, I tested both versions of the RDFa distiller and was surprised to
> find that they did not. Is it the fact that the namespaces and xml:base
> are defined outside the <rdf:RDF> element that trips you up?

Exactly... It works on my machine by now, but I do some other housekeeping before I push it to the server.

> I just
> threw that little wrinkle in because I'm evil.
> 

:-)

> RDF::RDFa::Parser has been passing this one since version 0.22 in
> December 2009. :-)
> 
> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2012 13:12:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 17 May 2012 13:12:28 GMT