W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?]

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 16:46:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFoNXfTW_swpeH_BFR5s3Ft5XdkgkONd18G5kwA_KuOE3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Cc: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 16 May 2012 16:06, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> It's important to note that the narrow change we adopted for limiting @rel when used with @property in HTML+RDFa broke exactly 0 existing test cases in the test suite. I think this is a good indication of how limited the impact of the solution is.

It might also be an indication that the test case repo is missing some
real world examples. Hopefully not :)

Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 14:46:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:56 UTC