W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: problem in "CURIE" XML Schema datatype definition

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:19:32 -0600
Message-ID: <4F280684.3050500@aptest.com>
To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
The production in that section is the normative definition.  Any prose 
is explanatory.  I will try to fix the regex to disallow whitespace.

On 1/31/2012 7:57 AM, Michael[tm] Smith wrote:
> Ivan Herman<ivan@w3.org>, 2012-01-31 14:20 +0100:
>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 13:48 , Michael[tm] Smith wrote:
>> If everything goes as planned, the spec might be updated... today?
> Cool. I hope the regexp in that other section can be updated too, then.
>>> That still disallows spaces in the reference part, though.
>> That is intentional:-)
> Yeah my point is the regexp in that other section needs to match what the
> normative part of the spec says.
> Actually btw what is the normative definition of a CURIE? You spec has text
> "The lexical space of a CURIE is as defined in curie below.", where the
> word "curie" is hyperlink to part of the BNFy thing that follows. But that
> thing is preceded by text that says, "The general syntax of a CURIE can be
> summarized as follows:..."
> I'm looking for an assertion that states unambiguously what a valid CURIE
> is, and "can be summarized" .. would not seem to qualify.
> So where can I find the actual normative CURIE definition?
>    --Mike

Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
+1 763 786 8160 x120
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 15:20:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:55 UTC