W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: problem in "CURIE" XML Schema datatype definition

From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:57:07 +0900
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20120131135706.GF35005@sideshowbarker>
Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, 2012-01-31 14:20 +0100:

> On Jan 31, 2012, at 13:48 , Michael[tm] Smith wrote:
> 
> If everything goes as planned, the spec might be updated... today?

Cool. I hope the regexp in that other section can be updated too, then.

> > That still disallows spaces in the reference part, though.
> 
> That is intentional:-)

Yeah my point is the regexp in that other section needs to match what the
normative part of the spec says.

Actually btw what is the normative definition of a CURIE? You spec has text
"The lexical space of a CURIE is as defined in curie below.", where the
word "curie" is hyperlink to part of the BNFy thing that follows. But that
thing is preceded by text that says, "The general syntax of a CURIE can be
summarized as follows:..."

I'm looking for an assertion that states unambiguously what a valid CURIE
is, and "can be summarized" .. would not seem to qualify.

So where can I find the actual normative CURIE definition?

  --Mike

-- 
Michael[tm] Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike/+
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 13:57:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:55 UTC