W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Review of XHTML+RDFa 1.1

From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:35:16 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGR+nnE7y88vG8gYpw8J2OKB-Cr9dB+YrH5CqcjooYcgPpnaWg@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org

Only a few remarks on the XHTML+RDFa 1.1 document.

Does the RDFa initial context for XHTML+RDFa 1.1 at
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/xhtml-rdfa-1.1 inherits the RDFa core
initial context? XHTML+RDFa 1.1 seems to only inherit the processing rules
from core. Why aren't the prefixes defined in the core initial context also
present in the XHTML+RDFa 1.1 initial context? (skos, foaf, schema, etc).

5.1 Metainformation Attributes Collection

prefix( NCName ': ' IRI )+
to be consistent with the other entries, it should read:
prefix (NCName ': ' IRI )+
also, none of the other entries have + in the end, is that intended?

Please note that the files targeted by the "latest version" links may
change slowly over time. See the W3C XHTML2 Working Group home page for
more information.
The XHTML2 was closed more than a year ago. are we still expecting changes

Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 13:35:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:55 UTC