- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:33:10 -0500
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
bcc: www-tag Hi Jeni, Thank you for your public feedback on the RDFa 1.1 documents. This is an official response from the RDF Web Apps WG to your issue before we enter the 3rd Last Call for the RDFa 1.1 work this coming Tuesday. The Last Call will last for 3 weeks, so there is still time for you to discuss your concerns if we have not fully addressed them. Your issue was tracked here: https://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/84 Explanation of Issue -------------------- The W3C TAG has been concerned about the discussion of fragment identifiers in the RDFa Core 1.1 specification. We have tried to apply changes, suggested by the TAG, to the document over the past year to address these concerns. Most recently, you submitted new text to make the issue of minting new IRIs using fragment identifiers a little more clear. Working Group Decision ---------------------- RESOLVED: Adopt the WWW TAG proposed language on fragment identifiers and place it into RDFa Core 1.1 http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2012-01-19#resolution_1 We have accepted your suggestion in full. Feedback -------- Since this is an official Working Group response to your issue, we would appreciate it if you responded to this e-mail and let us know if the decision made by the group is acceptable to you as soon as possible. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarm vs. OpenTransact Shootout http://manu.sporny.org/2011/web-payments-comparison/
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 17:33:46 UTC