- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:52:55 -0600
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Yes. That's why I mentioned it in my summary below. On 1/26/2012 12:20 AM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > I notice that the working group listed is the "RDFa Working Group", aren't we more formally now the "RDF Web Applications Working Group"? I notice this in RDFa 1.1 Core and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 > > Gregg > > On Jan 24, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: > >> I have made all the requested changes that I could. There are a couple >> of editorial questions outstanding. You can see the dated draft at >> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/ED-rdfa-core-20120124/ >> >> There is a diff mark from the 15 December draft. >> >> I still need to fix the name of the working group in the status section, >> but that's trivial. >> >> -- >> Shane McCarron >> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. >> +1 763 786 8160 x120 >> >> > -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. +1 763 786 8160 x120
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 06:53:29 UTC