W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2012

Re: RDFa Core 1.1 Ready for Last Call discussion

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:20:07 -0500
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
CC: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D0CDAC3A-39FA-4E68-86D5-F5E9EF8AADA4@greggkellogg.net>
I notice that the working group listed is the "RDFa Working Group", aren't we more formally now the "RDF Web Applications Working Group"? I notice this in RDFa 1.1 Core and XHTML+RDFa 1.1

Gregg

On Jan 24, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:

> I have made all the requested changes that I could. There are a couple 
> of editorial questions outstanding.  You can see the dated draft at 
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/ED-rdfa-core-20120124/
> 
> There is a diff mark from the 15 December draft.
> 
> I still need to fix the name of the working group in the status section, 
> but that's trivial.
> 
> -- 
> Shane McCarron
> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
> +1 763 786 8160 x120
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 06:28:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:55 UTC