W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2012

WG comments on XHTML+RDFa for LC publishing (ACTION-111)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:20:12 +0100
Message-Id: <4CA0B2F3-8C39-4F13-BFAA-8DD4BDCA5150@w3.org>
To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Here are my comments.

In the Status section:

- "the document was published by the RDFa Working Group": formally, the WG's name is RDFWA. (Note, the same error is also present in the RDFa Core document!)'

4. XHTML+RDFa definiton

The list of metainformation says:

XHTML+RDFa also uses the Ruby Annotation module as defined in [RUBY]:

Ruby Annotation Module
ruby, rbc, rtc, rb, rt, rp

Why is Ruby singled out that way? It reads as if Ruby had a special role with RDFa which, afaik, isn't true. I would propose to just list it with the other modules without any special attention.

5.2  XHTML RDFa Initial Context

The curent text says

This specification defines an RDFa Initial Context. It is available at http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/xhtml-rdfa-1.1.

Strictly speaking, this specification does _not_ define an initial context, it just reuses one that is defined in another specification...

E. Acknowledgement

- It should refer to the RDFWA Group
- The list of members should be updated (and synchronized with the other documents!). Eg, Gregg or Niklas are missing.

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2012 11:19:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:54 UTC