- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:12:43 -0400
- To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
- CC: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
It's okay for a processor to generate more triples. That's one of the reason we use SPARQL to test the results rather than graph comparison. Gregg On Apr 27, 2012, at 5:57 PM, Alex Milowski wrote: > While I generate the correct triple tested by the ASK WHERE in the > sparql, I also generate more: > > <http://www.example.org/me> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type> <http://www.example.org/class/Person> > <http://www.example.org/me> <http://www.example.org/pred/name> "Gregg Kellogg" > <http://www.example.org/me> <http://purl.org/dc/terms/language> "Ruby"^^<http://www.example.org/pred/lang> > <http://www.example.org/me> <http://www.example.org/pred/rel> <http://kellogg-assoc.com/> > <http://github.org/gkellogg/rdf_context> <http://www.example.org/pred/rev> <http://www.example.org/me> > > My test harness checks that the graphs are the same and not that a > specific question is answered. That way I know I'm not getting > incorrect extra triples. > > So... who's right for 0197? > > -- > --Alex Milowski > "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the > inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language > considered." > > Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics >
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2012 01:13:26 UTC