W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:17:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CABp3FNJB7YeMk5JwGDTN9cg2ROgp3qX3iUDPgxsDTbwi0v-O=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
So, should these tests be fixed or skipped?

On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2012, at 2:25 PM, Alex Milowski wrote:
>
>> ...and 0081, and 0082.  It is the same markup structure repeated over
>> again in slightly different situations. :)
>
> 0248: "multiple ways of handling incomplete triples (with @rev); RDFa 1.1 version"
> 0249: "multiple ways of handling incomplete triples (with @rel and @rev); RDFa 1.1 version"
>

-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2012 00:18:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 28 April 2012 00:18:14 GMT