W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Test Case 0058 / XHTML+RDFa 1.1

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 19:53:24 -0400
To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
CC: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EF49CFBE-2BE6-446E-B451-56E9E56A2FE1@greggkellogg.net>
On Apr 27, 2012, at 2:25 PM, Alex Milowski wrote:

> ...and 0081, and 0082.  It is the same markup structure repeated over
> again in slightly different situations. :)

0248: "multiple ways of handling incomplete triples (with @rev); RDFa 1.1 version"
0249: "multiple ways of handling incomplete triples (with @rel and @rev); RDFa 1.1 version"

Gregg

> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote:
>> It looks like tet 0078 has the same issue.
>> 
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com> wrote:
>>> I've been looking at Test Case 0058 for XHTML+RDFa 1.1 and I found this e-mail:
>>> 
>>>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012Feb/0012.html
>>> 
>>> It looks like this test case has not been changed.
> 
> 
> -- 
> --Alex Milowski
> "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
> inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
> considered."
> 
> Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
> 
Received on Friday, 27 April 2012 23:54:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 23:54:04 GMT