W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?]

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:58:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CABp3FNKyfJ7TLZ=Z1tNA5VsaEdFj5bOdLawyLoKN1e7hwcfoUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
> Alex,
>
> as far as I am concerned:
>
> if the mt is text/html, it is HTML5
> if it is application/xhtml+xml:
>   if the DTD is one of the many DTD-s defined for XHTML1 at W3C, it is XHTML1+RDFa
>   otherwise it is XHTML5+RDFa

But HTML5 has adopted many of those [1].  Another interpretation is
that those documents are HTML5 documents and so fall under HTML+RDFa
1.1 processing.  Do implementors have a choice?

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/the-xhtml-syntax.html#parsing-xhtml-documents


-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 13:58:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:20 GMT