W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Updated Editor's Draft

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 08:38:18 +0200
Cc: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <2D3E506C-79DD-4145-A0EA-DF3EA79B6D86@w3.org>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>

On Oct 21, 2011, at 23:56 , Shane McCarron wrote:
[snip]

> 
> 
> On 10/21/2011 7:51 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> Hi Shane,
>> 
>> On Oct 21, 2011, at 14:34 , Shane McCarron wrote:
>> 
>> [snip]
>>>> - Section 9, RDFa Initial Contexts: I think we should also list HTML5+RDFa as an approved host language. (I know there is a reference problem, though, RDFa core will be a standard before HTML5... nevertheless, we cannot simply ignore the HTML5 version).
>>> Absolutely not.  We can't reference something that isn't close to done.  If you want to reference HTML4+RDFa, I wouldn't object.
>>> 
>> But the way it is written now is that I cannot put an HTML5+RDFa document there which, eventually, will become really foolish.
>> 
>> But the text says 'currently'. So that may be good enough for now.
> 
> Actually, the way it written now you cannot use HTML5+RDFa exclusively.  You MUST use an approved format.  You may also use any other serialization you want.  JSON, for example.
> 

But as soon as HTML5+RDFa becomes approved, it becomes automatically one of those. What I do not want is to exclude HTML5 until a next release of the Recommendation. That would be silly. But I guess the 'currently' exactly does it...

>> 
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I have made some minor changes on the Overview-src file (careful with the cvs:-)
>>>> 
>>>>     - in the explanation of the procedure, in entry 2, 3 and 4, I have added the term 'initial' context where those lists have to be updated (with a reference to the sequence)
>>> I don't see where you changed anything here, but I don't think the sequence should talk about the initial context at all.  The sequence talks about the evaluation context, which is 'initialized' before processing starts.
>> The text now says, for example:
>> 
>> [[[
>> For every subject with a pair of predicates that have the values rdfa:prefix and rdfa:uri, create a key-value mapping from the rdfa:prefix object literal (the key) to the rdfa:uri object literal (the value). Add this mapping to the list of IRI mappings of the initial evaluation context, after transforming the 'prefix' component to lower-case.
>> ]]]
>> 
>> your version did not say 'initial evaluation context'. This is the term used in 7.5 and where it is referenced back here. What is the problem with that?
> 
> Hmm.  I might word smith this a tad more.  The thing we agreed upon is 'initial context' for the start of processing, and 'evaluation context' for what happens when processing is ongoing.

Oops, sorry...

Ivan


> 
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Shane McCarron
> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
> +1 763 786 8160 x120
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf







Received on Saturday, 22 October 2011 06:36:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:18 GMT