W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Link relations in RDFa (Was: Re: Guidance on publishing in multiple formats) (ISSUE-108)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:54:28 +0100
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <ECF314FF-6615-4460-AC6A-7C123BEF602D@w3.org>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
I am sorry, two buglets in the mail:

- ISSUE-108 is actually labelled as 'OPEN', though that may be just a clerical mistake insofar as neither Manu nor I made the change on the tracker after the meeting of the 13th of October
- I forgot to give a reference to my earlier mail, here it is:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Oct/0050.html

Ivan

On Nov 13, 2011, at 13:36 , Ivan Herman wrote:

> I had an action in the past (ACTION-100) on the link registry, bound to ISSUE-108. This was the result of a resolution we had on the WG:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-10-13#ISSUE__2d_108__3a__Refine__2f_deprecate_Link_relations
> 
> where we decided to use the IANA registry as the authoritative list for the link relations. However, I think that the information given by Tantek:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Nov/0044.html
> 
> changes the background of the decision and forces us to reopen ISSUE-108.
> 
> The fact that the link registry is done via a wiki, ie, becoming way more dynamic than the IANA registry, coupled with the analysis  of Jeni below reinforces my (and her:-) original opinion[1], ie, that RDFa 1.1 + HTML5 should ignore the link relations.
> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
> 
> [1]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 12, 2011, at 21:10 , Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> 
>> Obviously for consideration by this group too.
>> 
>> Gregg Kellogg
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
>>> Date: November 12, 2011 11:59:37 AM PST
>>> To: HTML Data Task Force WG <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>
>>> Subject: Re: Link relations in RDFa (Was: Re: Guidance on publishing in multiple formats)
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I've written up the issues with link relations in RDFa as I understand them at:
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML_Data_Improvements#Link_Relations
>>> 
>>> Please take a look and let me know if I've missed anything.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Jeni
>>> -- 
>>> Jeni Tennison
>>> http://www.jenitennison.com
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 14 November 2011 08:51:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:18 GMT