W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Property and Typeof Wiki (ACTION-101) (ACTION-102)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:30:18 +0100
Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9201902E-39D6-4FD6-A355-6778BBF8D8A8@w3.org>
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>

On Nov 9, 2011, at 24:42 , Gregg Kellogg wrote:

> I've implemented the new steps, and my processor passes all the test cases (list problems were due to a 2-character bug: else != elsif :P).

Great!

(We should have intelligent compilers that recognize such misspelling:-)

> 
> However, the changes do cause some existing test suite tests to fail, as they should:
> 
> 0046: @typeof with @rel present, no @href, @resource, or @about
> 	This fails because of the different interpretation of @typeof with no @about.
> 
> 0047: @typeof with @rel and @resource present, no @about
> 	This fails because of the different interpretation of @typeof with @resource.
> 
> 0058: hanging @rel creates multiple triples, @typeof permutation
> 0078: Multiple incomplete triples
> 0081: multiple ways of handling incomplete triples (with @rev)
> 0082: multiple ways of handling incomplete triples (with @rel and @rev)
> 	These fail because the of re-interpretation of @property with @typeof
> 

Yes, indeed.

> If we approve this change to @property, this would remove these test cases from rdfa1.1. We may need to reproduce them with alternate expectations.

Yes. But the page still contains technical issues regarding the inconsistency of the @property vs. chaining behaviour. We should discuss that...

Ivan



> 
> Gregg
> 
> On Nov 7, 2011, at 5:11 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
> 
>> I have made some changes on [1]: one of the test cases was erroneous (the HTML part was wrong), I have added 2 more test cases, and, most importantly, I have updated the processing steps so that it now covers both the @property and the @typeof changes.
>> 
>> I have an implementation running locally, passing all the tests on the page. However, my implementation does not follow 100% the processing steps, ie, it differs slightly from what is written there. Would be good if somebody made a thorough check on those.
>> 
>> I think we should really share this page, asap, with the HTML Data task force as well as the schema.org people. Gregg and I did not want to do that until we get at least some approval from the group... Anybody?
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/PropertyAndTypeof
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 4, 2011, at 14:50 , Ivan Herman wrote:
>> 
>>> ... and I have made additions and some changes on the page. In particular, I have added a more detailed description on the rules, and I have also added a new version of the RDFa 1.1 example of the schama.org page.
>>> 
>>> Would be good to have a green light on sending this reference to Guha, DanBri, Peter, to gather feedbacks asap
>>> 
>>> Ivan
>>> 
>>> Tracker, for ACTION-102, this completes my action
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf







Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 08:28:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:18 GMT