W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Property and Typeof Wiki (ACTION-101) (ACTION-102)

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 18:42:15 -0500
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BDB5E6C4-9C2E-460E-837D-568FD024FB60@greggkellogg.net>
I've implemented the new steps, and my processor passes all the test cases (list problems were due to a 2-character bug: else != elsif :P).

However, the changes do cause some existing test suite tests to fail, as they should:

0046: @typeof with @rel present, no @href, @resource, or @about
	This fails because of the different interpretation of @typeof with no @about.

0047: @typeof with @rel and @resource present, no @about
	This fails because of the different interpretation of @typeof with @resource.

0058: hanging @rel creates multiple triples, @typeof permutation
0078: Multiple incomplete triples
0081: multiple ways of handling incomplete triples (with @rev)
0082: multiple ways of handling incomplete triples (with @rel and @rev)
	These fail because the of re-interpretation of @property with @typeof

If we approve this change to @property, this would remove these test cases from rdfa1.1. We may need to reproduce them with alternate expectations.

Gregg

On Nov 7, 2011, at 5:11 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:

> I have made some changes on [1]: one of the test cases was erroneous (the HTML part was wrong), I have added 2 more test cases, and, most importantly, I have updated the processing steps so that it now covers both the @property and the @typeof changes.
> 
> I have an implementation running locally, passing all the tests on the page. However, my implementation does not follow 100% the processing steps, ie, it differs slightly from what is written there. Would be good if somebody made a thorough check on those.
> 
> I think we should really share this page, asap, with the HTML Data task force as well as the schema.org people. Gregg and I did not want to do that until we get at least some approval from the group... Anybody?
> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/PropertyAndTypeof
> 
> 
> On Nov 4, 2011, at 14:50 , Ivan Herman wrote:
> 
>> ... and I have made additions and some changes on the page. In particular, I have added a more detailed description on the rules, and I have also added a new version of the RDFa 1.1 example of the schama.org page.
>> 
>> Would be good to have a green light on sending this reference to Guha, DanBri, Peter, to gather feedbacks asap
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> Tracker, for ACTION-102, this completes my action
>> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 23:43:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:18 GMT