Ivan Herman wrote: > On May 3, 2011, at 18:30 , Nathan wrote: >> - we currently use the definition of CURIE, but we need to support all kinds, qname, curie, the latest changes as per the RDF WG - so what do we call it and define it as? > > I would like to understand what really the differences/options are. Can you help out? yes, will write up under separate cover, as i guess it relates to RDFa/CURIE (possibly) and RDF WG too. >> - createNamedNode currently accepts a string-IRI, CURIE or Term, however there are some ambiguities possible with that (as we know), in my implementation I've defined it as accepting a string IRI only, should we make the spec match? (I can't think of a reason not to, can you?) > > I think accepting only a IRI is fine. If somebody wants to play, one can always use a resolve before passing on the argument to createNamedNode cool, will change, more issues on the way.. NathanReceived on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 18:01:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:17 GMT