W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: Last Call Response to Issue 72: XML+RDFa

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 06:55:58 +0100
Message-Id: <B4722076-AB7D-479B-A071-5381C213B2D1@w3.org>
Cc: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Yes, I am happy with the changes, too.

Thank you.

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman
Tel:+31 641044153
http://www.ivan-herman.net



On 10 Mar 2011, at 06:12, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> On 03/09/2011 11:52 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:
>> Thanks for your Last Call comment suggesting that we integrate a basic
>> XML+RDFa profile.  The working group debated the concept, and has
>> integrated an XML+RDFa document type and profile into RDFa Core 1.1. 
>> You can see an Editor's Draft that reflects these changes at
>> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2011/ED-rdfa-core-20110306/
>> 
>> Please respond and confirm your acceptance of the changes.
> 
> Thanks for the response Shane. I think I messed up and should have put
> Ivan down as the originator of that issue in the tracker:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-01-06#XHTML_Profile_document_changes__2f_management
> 
> Although, reading back through the minutes - it's confusing who should
> respond. So, I'll just say: I'm fine with the changes - great work team
> RDFa!
> 
> Ivan, if you could respond and let us know if you're good with the
> changes as well, we can close this issue.
> 
> -- manu
> 
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Towards Universal Web Commerce
> http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/01/31/web-commerce/
> 
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 05:54:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:09 GMT