W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > March 2011

Re: Last Call Response to Issue 72: XML+RDFa

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:12:09 -0500
Message-ID: <4D785DA9.7070309@digitalbazaar.com>
To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 03/09/2011 11:52 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:
> Thanks for your Last Call comment suggesting that we integrate a basic
> XML+RDFa profile.  The working group debated the concept, and has
> integrated an XML+RDFa document type and profile into RDFa Core 1.1. 
> You can see an Editor's Draft that reflects these changes at
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2011/ED-rdfa-core-20110306/
> 
> Please respond and confirm your acceptance of the changes.

Thanks for the response Shane. I think I messed up and should have put
Ivan down as the originator of that issue in the tracker:

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-01-06#XHTML_Profile_document_changes__2f_management

Although, reading back through the minutes - it's confusing who should
respond. So, I'll just say: I'm fine with the changes - great work team
RDFa!

Ivan, if you could respond and let us know if you're good with the
changes as well, we can close this issue.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Towards Universal Web Commerce
http://digitalbazaar.com/2011/01/31/web-commerce/
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 05:12:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:09 GMT