W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > January 2011

Re: CURIEs: cite RDFa Core or CURIE WG Note?

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:09:36 -0600
Message-ID: <4D375310.1040804@aptest.com>
To: Christoph LANGE <ch.lange@jacobs-university.de>
CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
The only recommendation out today is rdfa-syntax.  I would cite that.  
Once RDFa Core is a recommendation, I would switch and cite that.

On 1/19/2011 2:55 PM, Christoph LANGE wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> when writing about CURIEs  not specifically in the context of RDFa ,
> what should I cite?  http://www.w3.org/TR/curie (of which there is now a
> recent version, to my pleasant surprise), or section 6 of
> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core?
>
> Cheers, and thanks in advance,
>
> Christoph
>

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 21:10:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:08 GMT