W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Editorial issue on default context

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:17:18 +0100
To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Message-Id: <ADF0873F-6109-42C5-ACE8-C03D83032B36@w3.org>
Guys, 

I have seen the resolution of last week on the link relations (and I am happy with the resolution). On the purely editorial level:

- I have modified http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1.html to include three terms, namely describedby (that one was already there), license and role
- I have created a new http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/xhtml-rdfa-1.1.html file to list the XHTML+RDFa terms. I guess a reference to this default context should be added to the XHTML+RDFa language profile
- I have kept the URI http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/html-rdfa-1.1.html for now, but it does not define anything

Is this ok?

Ivan

----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2011 08:17:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:18 GMT