W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Editorial issue on default context

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 19:55:29 -0500
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Message-ID: <E041E166-8E82-4EBF-B0A3-54AB1CB478BF@greggkellogg.net>
I'm having some issues with these documents. Firstly, what is the canonical URIs for these documents? The document at http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1.html has an @about of http://www.w3.org/profile/rdfa-1.1.html. Which is it intended to be? I note that Shane's used the dated version in the spec.

http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1.html issues:

* Line 5 has too many quotes, and prevents the rest of the document from parsing as XML, which I do for XHTML documents.
* the <br> on line 303 is not self-closing

Others look okay.

Gregg

On Dec 8, 2011, at 12:17 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:

> Guys, 
> 
> I have seen the resolution of last week on the link relations (and I am happy with the resolution). On the purely editorial level:
> 
> - I have modified http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1.html to include three terms, namely describedby (that one was already there), license and role
> - I have created a new http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/xhtml-rdfa-1.1.html file to list the XHTML+RDFa terms. I guess a reference to this default context should be added to the XHTML+RDFa language profile
> - I have kept the URI http://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/html-rdfa-1.1.html for now, but it does not define anything
> 
> Is this ok?
> 
> Ivan
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 9 December 2011 00:56:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:18 GMT