W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Getting the XHTML+RDFa default profile to be interesting

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:55:13 +0000
To: nathan@webr3.org
Cc: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20101109235513.060d3040@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:09:12 +0000
Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:

> cool - what about http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988#section-6.2.2
> and
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml -
> aren't the same terms mapped to (or may be mapped to) different IRIs?

Atom (which fed into RFC 5988) maps link relations by adding this
prefix:

	http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/

RDFa 1.0 maps many of the same relations to:

	http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#

RDFa 1.1 can't really differ from 1.0 - we're chartered to maintain
backwards compatibility as much as possible. However, the vocab could
use owl:equivalentProperty or rdfs:subPropertyOf to link to the IANA
URIs.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 23:55:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:50 UTC