Re: Getting the XHTML+RDFa default profile to be interesting

Toby Inkster wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:09:12 +0000
> Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
> 
>> cool - what about http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988#section-6.2.2
>> and
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml -
>> aren't the same terms mapped to (or may be mapped to) different IRIs?
> 
> Atom (which fed into RFC 5988) maps link relations by adding this
> prefix:
> 
> 	http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/
> 
> RDFa 1.0 maps many of the same relations to:
> 
> 	http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#
> 
> RDFa 1.1 can't really differ from 1.0 - we're chartered to maintain
> backwards compatibility as much as possible. However, the vocab could
> use owl:equivalentProperty or rdfs:subPropertyOf to link to the IANA
> URIs.
> 

sounds like a good fix/workaround :)