W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Getting the XHTML+RDFa default profile to be interesting

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:59:41 +0000
Message-ID: <4CD9E06D.5030707@webr3.org>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
CC: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Toby Inkster wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:09:12 +0000
> Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
> 
>> cool - what about http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988#section-6.2.2
>> and
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml -
>> aren't the same terms mapped to (or may be mapped to) different IRIs?
> 
> Atom (which fed into RFC 5988) maps link relations by adding this
> prefix:
> 
> 	http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/
> 
> RDFa 1.0 maps many of the same relations to:
> 
> 	http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#
> 
> RDFa 1.1 can't really differ from 1.0 - we're chartered to maintain
> backwards compatibility as much as possible. However, the vocab could
> use owl:equivalentProperty or rdfs:subPropertyOf to link to the IANA
> URIs.
> 

sounds like a good fix/workaround :)
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 00:00:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:55:08 GMT