- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:41:20 -0400
- To: W3C RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 03/26/2010 05:33 AM, Toby Inkster wrote: > On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 15:55 -0400, Ivan Herman wrote: >> Having read the minutes of the 2010-03-25, I have committed a new >> version of the document: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2010/ED-vocab-20100326/ > > A few editorial issues: One more editorial issue: Since I forgot to include one option in the straw poll, we haven't decided whether or not to allow the definition of prefixes in an RDFa Profile document. The straw poll should have included that question and it didn't... woops, my bad. What we did decide was that keywords are allowed in RDFa Profile documents. I'll try to get a straw poll option up in the next couple of days so we can get consensus decide whether or not to put this in the RDFa Core FPWD. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarming Goes Open Source http://blog.digitalbazaar.com/2010/02/01/bitmunk-payswarming/
Received on Friday, 26 March 2010 13:41:48 UTC